The Invisible Chains: What "The Lottery" Teaches Us About Cultural Blindness
Philosophy

The Invisible Chains: What "The Lottery" Teaches Us About Cultural Blindness

eneadodi-hncmgz · 5 min read ·

Read “The Lottery” here

Or watch it here:

A chilling exploration of how cultural norms shape our reality, and why the most dangerous traditions are the ones we can’t see.

Meet Shirley Jackson: The Master of Hidden Horror

When Shirley Jackson published “The Lottery” in The New Yorker in 1948, she didn’t just write a story – she held up a mirror to society that continues to reflect our darkest truths. Jackson, an American literary genius, specialized in exposing the shadows lurking beneath the seemingly ordinary surface of small-town life. Her genius wasn’t in creating monsters, but in revealing how monstrous the familiar could be.

The Story’s Deceptive Simplicity

Picture this: A sun-drenched summer morning. Children gathering stones. Neighbors conversing. It’s the kind of scene Norman Rockwell might paint – until it isn’t. What follows is perhaps the most masterful bait-and-switch in literary history, as Jackson transforms this bucolic scene into a nightmare that has haunted readers for generations. One of the children had picked up a stone so large for the small town tradition that they couldn’t comfortably hold it with both arms!

The Fish Bowl Effect: Swimming in Invisible Water

Here’s where things get fascinating. David Foster Wallace once opened a commencement speech with a profound observation:

“There are these two young fish swimming along, and they happen to meet an older fish swimming the other way, who nods at them and says, ‘Morning, boys. How’s the water?’ And the two young fish swim on for a bit, and then eventually one of them looks over at the other and goes, ‘What the hell is water?’”

This perfectly captures our relationship with cultural assumptions. Like those fish, we’re often unaware of the “water” – the cultural context – we swim in. Psychologist Jonathan Haidt backs this up in his groundbreaking work “The Righteous Mind,” where he demonstrates how our moral judgments often come first, with our reasoning following behind to justify what we already “feel” is right.

The Evolution Trap

Joseph Henrich, in “The Secret of Our Success,” reveals something fascinating about how human societies work:

“This interaction between cultural and genetic evolution generated a process that can be described as autocatalytic, meaning that it produces the fuel that propels it. Once cultural information began to accumulate and produce cultural adaptations, the main selection pressure on genes revolved around improving our psychological abilities to acquire, store, process, and organize the array of fitness-enhancing skills and practices that became increasingly available in the minds of the others in one’s group.”

We’re literally wired to follow the crowd. Think about the villagers in “The Lottery” – their ability to participate in such a horrific ritual wasn’t a bug in human nature, it was a feature. Our brains evolved specifically to absorb and maintain cultural practices without questioning them. The better we got at preserving traditions, the more likely we were to survive.

The Comfortable Cage of Common Sense

Here’s a chilling example: In 1858, Dr. Ignaz Semmelweis noticed that mothers were dying in childbirth at alarming rates. His radical suggestion? That doctors should wash their hands between performing autopsies and delivering babies. For this seemingly obvious insight, he was ridiculed, fired, and ultimately died in an asylum.

Think about that for a moment. The medical establishment was so certain of their “common sense” that they literally destroyed a man for suggesting they should clean their hands. Just like the villagers in “The Lottery” who saw nothing wrong with their annual tradition, these educated doctors couldn’t see the horror of their own practices.

Similarly, when Darwin first proposed his theory of evolution, he was met with not just skepticism, but outright hostility. The scientific community, comfortable in their belief that species were unchanging and created perfect, treated him as a dangerous radical.

Or consider how in the late 19th century, the scientific establishment firmly believed in “Social Darwinism” – the idea that certain races were biologically superior to others. When anyone questioned these ideas, they were dismissed as unscientific or sentimental, just as anyone questioning the lottery was seen as a threat to the village’s way of life.

Today’s Hidden Lotteries

What are our modern equivalents of “The Lottery”? Here are some possibilities:

  • Our acceptance of social media algorithms shaping our worldview
  • The 40-hour workweek as an unquestioned standard
  • Our limitless expansion of meaning of ‘gender’
  • Our relationship with constant connectivity
  • The assumption that economic growth must be endless

Your Challenge: Radical Reflection

Psychologist Daniel Kahneman warns us that “We can be blind to the obvious, and we are also blind to our blindness.” So, I challenge you to:

  1. Identify three traditions you follow without questioning
  2. Question one “obvious truth” in your field of work
  3. Look for modern “lotteries” in your daily life
  4. Ask yourself: What will our grandchildren condemn us for?

The Path Forward

As philosopher Karl Popper noted in “The Open Society and Its Enemies”:

“We must plan for freedom, and not only for security, if for no other reason than only freedom can make security more secure.”

I think Karl Popper said it perfectly. We as humans always need to flexibility to turn back, to move forward, or to critically question our development as a civilization.